Novelty in Movement: NYT Reports It matters
In an updated article by NYT Phys Ed writer Gretchen Reynolds, we see another validation of Dr. Feldenkrais’ work. Ms. Reynolds cites a 2019 study published in PLOS ONE, “The effects of exercise variation in muscle thickness, maximal strength and motivation in resistance trained men.” The study finds that inconstancy and unfamiliar routines perplex and discombobulate our brains and stimulate against reaching a training plateau. They postulate that muscles supposedly will respond to the unfamiliar demands of the workouts by continuing to adapt.
The study concludes: Varying exercise selection had a positive effect on enhancing motivation to train in resistance-trained men, while eliciting similar improvements in muscular adaptations.
Of course, as Moshe Feldenkrais reminds us, muscles don’t know anything and cannot be ‘confused.’ In face, muscles are very dumb (except perhaps for the tongue, which is loaded with sensors and can move in six directions.) It’s the brain doing the work, responding to novel challenges, learning from variety and creating new, more efficient pathways for whole body movement. Awareness Through Movement® has novelty baked into the philosophy - getting bored is not an option!